Focus on Mortgage Crisis in City Council

By Maurice Pinzon
This past Saturday, the Reverend Jesse Jackson led a hearing sponsored by the New York City Council to focus attention on the sub-prime mortgage crisis. The Reverend Jackson indicated the problematic loans were concentrated in specific New York City neighborhoods and challenged the audience in the Council Chambers not to renegotiate with lenders individually, but rather to participate in “mass negotiations” of sub-prime loans.

The Reverend Jackson accused sub-prime lenders as disproportionately targeting poor Latino and African-American borrowers. He said, “There are now efforts to bailout, or to liquefy the bankers and not to bailout in the nation the affected victims.” Those “victims” he indicated, were living in what he called, “sub-prime predator zones,” where “the poorest people pay the most for the least.”

The Reverend Jackson said in states like Michigan, the foreclosure rates were “20 percent white, 40 percent Latino, 55 percent black.” He indicated that “those numbers hold up when you look at Queens” and other Latino and African-American neighborhoods in New York City.

Also at the hearing was Michigan Congressman John Conyers Jr., who told the audience in the packed Council Chambers that as representative of the House Judiciary Committee, it was within his committee’s jurisdiction to rewrite the bankruptcy code. “We are working on a master plan,” he said.

The proposed legislation, Congressman Conyers said, would “allow those who get caught up in a foreclosure situation the immediate ability to rewrite their mortgage at the reduced actual value of the property, rather than the usual inflated value in which it was sold,” with the goal of getting a fixed rate.

Congressman Conyers pointed out that a crisis he called the most serious since the Savings and Loans scandal also required the participation of the U.S. Attorney General. He said, “Those who have violated the law should be prosecuted,” for predatory or discriminatory lending practices.

Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, from Texas, agreed. She said the wide sub-prime crisis was “about blatantly looking in the face of those who have perpetrated a crime against people who simply wanted to have a house and to buy into the American Dream.”

And she pointed out it was not just lenders who were to blame but also Wall Street’s financial institutions that had built a financial infrastructure around sub-prime loans, thereby turning them into investments opportunities.

The hearing was chaired by Councilman Leroy Comrie, whose constituents have been disproportionately impacted by the mortgage crisis. Other council members at the hearing were Lewis Fidler, Gale Brewer, Letitia James, Robert Jackson, James Sanders, Jr. and Al Vann.

Council member Fidler characterized the lending institutions as “an industry that had run amok.”

Voters must absolutely insist, said Council member Fidler, that “as the campaign for president of the United States continues, that the candidates for both parties lay their plan, lay out their agenda, tell us what they are going to do about this, perhaps the most significant crisis that is affecting the people of this country domestically for many, many years.”

Although ostensibly a “Community Forum Addressing Foreclosure Crisis,” the event became a vehicle for the Reverend Jackson and elected officials to convey a sense that they were angry or moving on an issue that is spreading economic fear and dislocation throughout the nation.

The participants wanted to point out that New York City was not immune to the mortgage crisis.

Posted in Economy, Government & Politics | Leave a comment

Bloomberg’s New York: Garment Industry Disappearing

Tracy Reese Spring 2009 Collection (Photo by Maurice Pinzon)

Tracy Reese Spring 2009 Collection (Photo by Maurice Pinzon)

By Maurice Pinzon
During the current financial crisis on Wall Street, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s knowledge of how money circulates and is leveraged gives him a well-informed perspective of the volatility of the economic crisis and how it affects the city’s finances. It is the logic behind his quest for a third term as mayor.

But early in his administration, Mayor Bloomberg promised to reduce the city’s heavy dependence on Wall Street. The Bloomberg administration sought to diversify New York City’s economy by supporting the tourism, communications, media, film, information services and technology sectors. One major way the city planned to accommodate these industries was to rezone large tracts of the city. According to a speech directed at a business group last February by New York City’s Planning Chair, Amanda M. Burden, Ms. Burden cited the unprecedented “construction boom in all five boroughs that will, when completed a decade from now, stand as one of the greatest in New York City’s history.”

According to her prepared speech, she added, “Our strategic agenda was also shaped by the prescient Schumer, ”˜Group of 35′ report, issued in 2001. That report warned that the city’s long term economic growth would be limited by a severe lack of office space. It forecast a need for 60 million square feet of commercial space by 2020. The report recommended the creation of new and expanded business districts in 5 boroughs by rezoning to allow for higher density commercial use.”

But just as the overproduction of housing across the nation created a housing bubble, the politically-powerful real estate industry may have created its own corporate housing bubble by overproducing office space. As a result, the rezoning generated by this explosion of commercial buildings may end up destroying existing industries. Critics have argued this issue in the case of Willets Point, a project that is currently under review by the New York City Council, where an industrial area with an estimated 1,500 jobs could be destroyed if the rezoning is approved by the City Council.

Another area where jobs are disappearing and space is being pinched is the garment industry, where manufacturing space and work have been moving overseas. According to many in the fashion industry, the Bloomberg administration has moved lethargically in protecting these jobs and spaces.

A few weeks ago, during New York Fashion Week, Nanette Lepore, a New York fashion designer, was perplexed by the lack of urgency that Mayor Bloomberg had given to the loss of apparel jobs in the garment district. She provided anecdotal evidence of the garment district’s fragile manufacturing base disappearing and just a couple of weeks ago, the New York State Department of Labor corroborated Ms. Lepore’s fears. The data, released by the agency on September 18, 2008, indicated that from August 1998 to August 2008, New York City lost 52,200 apparel jobs. Mayor Bloomberg has been in office since January 2002.

Ms. Lepore does not understand why Mayor Bloomberg fails to see the connection between the mix of manufacturing jobs in the garment industry and the secondary industries that the garment industry generates.

In a city that is famous for its role in the fashion industry, Ms. Lepore wonders how it is that the current administration plans ahead for those who have managed to carefully look after the real estate industry, but leaves those in the fabric-cutting world suffocating underneath a heap of their own cloth. Ms. Lepore wonders whether Mayor Bloomberg has ever visited a garment factory in his life. After all, those garment factories are the foundation of a trade that encourages tourism, communications, media, film, information services and technology throughout the city. In a time of financial instability, fashion industry insiders insist that Mayor Bloomberg may want to consider the fact that fashion has a circulation of its own – most prominently culturally, but also as a reliable money-maker for the city.

According to the New York City Economic Development Corporation, the twice-yearly New York Fashion Week “generates $466 million in direct visitor spending per year.” This translates into an overall economic impact in New York City of $782 million a year.

For many who have had some contact with fashion industry, it is hard to see how the city could credibly have a festival of haute couture without any significant amount of manufacturing taking place in the city itself. If the garment district continues to retrench, New York Fashion Week may soon become merely a fashionable Potemkin village.

Posted in Economy, Fashion, Government & Politics | Comments Off on Bloomberg’s New York: Garment Industry Disappearing

Flushing No. 7 Line’s Willets Point Station Awaits a Name Change

By Maurice Pinzon
Next Monday, former New York Mets first baseman Keith Hernandez is scheduled to throw out the first pitch on opening day at Shea Stadium in Flushing. As fans enter the 43-year-old stadium, they will be able to catch a glimpse of “Citi Field,” the newly branded Mets stadium being constructed next to Shea.

But before the new stadium is built, the subway station where thousands of fans get off the No. 7 train to watch Mets games may also need a name change. The signs in the Flushing station now read “Willets Point-Shea Stadium.”

The naming rights to the new Mets stadium were acquired by Citigroup, the financial services company, in an exclusive 20-year deal with the New York Mets owners.

According to the Mets organization’s November 2006 news release announcing the renaming, the agreement is a “fully integrated partnership [that] also includes, for Citi, brand and business unit presence throughout the new ballpark[,] rights to the Mets and Citi Field marks”, and other promotional benefits.

Citigroup and the Mets seemingly have a Velcro branding relationship, but it is not clear whether the MTA will accept a name change to “Willets Point-Citi Field.”

So far they are not saying. MTA spokeswoman Mercedes Padilla told New York News Network that “We haven’t made any decision” on a name change for the train station.

In response to an inquiry, a Mets spokesperson said, “The Mets are in continuing dialogue with the MTA on a variety of topics at this time primarily focused on enhanced and expanded service on the 7 Subway and LIRR. The name of the station will not change for 2007 or 2008.”

But what about in 2009, when Citi Field is supposed to be completed?

Marilyn Bitterman, District Manager of Community Board 7, the board that covers Flushing, believes the station would eventually be named Citi Field. But she also told New York News Network that so far the MTA has not been very cooperative in committing to more services on the No. 7 line or any of the details concerning a proposed redesign of the Willets Point subway station. But a name change for the station was discussed last Thursday at a meeting attended by various City officials and Mets representatives.

On the other side of the tracks, the United States Tennis Association (USTA), which passed up the financial incentive to rename the USTA National Tennis Center after a corporate sponsor, instead chose to name its sports facility in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.

The USTA may want a say in what the train station is called, since it also serves fans attending tennis matches, not to mention the thousands of Queens residents who visit the park.

And with a proposal to build a convention center across the street from Citi Field – an area now occupied by scrap metal and auto body shops and other related businesses, the name of the Willets Point subway station may still be up for grabs.

Posted in Economy, Government & Politics | Leave a comment