Capturing the Spirit of New York City After September 11, 2001

Michael Arad Speaking at the Generation Engage Event at P.S.1 in Long Island City. (Photo by Maurice Pinzon)

Michael Arad Speaking at the Generation Engage Event at P.S.1 in Long Island City. (Photo by Maurice Pinzon)

Mr. Arad discussed these issues at P.S.1 in Long Island City, at an event sponsored by Generation Engage. The organization aims to provide non-college-educated young adults with avenues to activism. In introductory remarks, Mr. Arad described the inspiration for his winning memorial design.

Mr. Arad said: “I remember going to Washington Square Park a few nights after September 11 and standing there around that fountain in the middle of the park about 2 in the morning. I came there by myself and there were probably around a dozen people standing around that fountain, and I felt this strong sense of community ”” that we were there together. We didn’t say anything. No words were spoken.”

It was the first time he had felt such a sense of community, especially in a city that he described as “a very easy city to sort of be in, but not of,” where he said “you can sort of observe everything and keep a nice cool distance.”

“That was my feeling about New York, or at least how it was four years ago,” Mr. Arad reflected.

Back then, Mr. Arad said he flew an American flag ”” something he thought he would never do, having lived in so many different places without feeling a deep connection to any of them.

Indeed, many New Yorkers experienced those same emotions in the days following September 11, 2001, posting American flags outside their windows or by their doors as if temporarily adopting the American flag as a symbol for New York City.

A group of about 150 young people listened as Mr. Arad told them that he eventually settled on an “image in my mind of these two voids in the Hudson River, the water just sort of falling into them, and they would never fill up.”

He added, “I just imagined these two empty vessels”¦ and for me they were a way of conveying the sense of absence and loss, which I felt at the time.”

After the architectural contest for the memorial was announced, Mr. Arad gained a new focus, forced to think of how that image could be transposed onto the grounds of the World Trade Center site.

Mr. Arad said in his mind, it was essential to have the falling water “come down below ground to these galleries, which would surround the pools. And to me this space is so important because what I wanted to do is capture what I felt here in New York after September 11 ”” to create a place where people could come together, could face the names of all these people who died here and not feel alone as they were doing it, but feel that they were part of something greater.”

Last Tuesday, Governor George E. Pataki and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg sent out a news release without the usual grandiose public announcement to accompany it. Instead, this announcement about the site’s development essentially reversed the elements in Mr. Arad’s memorial design.

Mayor Bloomberg’s vision and words regarding the rebuilding of the World Trade Center site, and downtown Manhattan in general, always have been more practical than Governor Pataki’s. In December 2002, Mayor Bloomberg outlined a comprehensive plan to revitalize downtown Manhattan that included, transportation, residential, open space and business components. But this vision and the necessary focus was soon lost as the Bloomberg administration ceded power to Governor Pataki and as the mayor and Deputy Mayor Daniel L. Dockoroff began spending more time worrying about bringing the Olympics to New York City in 2012.

The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC), the agency tasked with rebuilding and revitalizing the World Trade Center site and downtown Manhattan, has functioned like a staffing temp agency and it became a decision-making bureaucratic black hole as evidenced by the various false starts in the rebuilding efforts. In addition to the memorial redesign, to name just a few problems, we have the redesign of the Freedom Tower, the problematic deconstruction of the Deutsche Bank site, the Larry Silverstein power struggle with the mayor and governor, the anemic fundraising results for the memorial and the controversy over the Cultural Center’s programming.

Only now Mayor Bloomberg appears to be gaining greater influence over the downtown redevelopment effort as Governor Pataki’s time in office runs out and as the governor feels compelled to install a symbolic memorial cornerstone before increasing his presidential campaign efforts in Iowa.

The World Trade Center’s memorial mission statement on the LMDC website reads in part: “Remember and honor the thousands of innocent men, women, and children murdered by terrorists”¦.respect this place made sacred through tragic loss”¦recognize the endurance of those who survived, the courage of those who risked their lives to save others, and the compassion of all who supported us in our darkest hours”¦.may the lives remembered, the deeds recognized, and the spirit reawakened be eternal beacons”¦”.

Bold language has succumbed to a reassessment by Frank J. Sciame, a construction executive commissioned by LMDC to reduce the costs of the memorial. In his report to LMDC, Mr. Sciame cites the “Reduction of costs through traditional value engineering methods.” For a definition of value engineering, see: Value Engineering

Posted in Government & Politics, New York Culture | Comments Off on Capturing the Spirit of New York City After September 11, 2001

Critics Call for City to Reconsider Willets Point Development Process

By Maurice Pinzon
Yesterday, on the steps of City Hall, City Council member Hiram Monserrate assembled an assortment of advocates and community leaders who spoke in opposition to the City’s Economic Development Corporation’s (EDC) proposed development of Willets Point.

Council member Monserrate and critics charged EDC with being uninterested in the people who worked and owned businesses in Willets Point, and the people who lived in the nearby communities of Corona and Flushing. Council member Monserrate represents Corona and Willets Point, and was joined by Council member John Liu, who represents Flushing. Both vowed to take up the fight in the City Council if the Bloomberg administration did not reconsider its current development course for Willets Point.

Willets Point is located across the street from the east parking lot of Shea Stadium, where the Mets plan to build their new stadium. Willets Point is often referred to as “The Iron Triangle” because of its auto body shops and industrial businesses.

Without sewers, paved roads, sidewalks and other common amenities, and pot holes the size of small craters, the streets of Willets Point can be mistaken for a place in an economically underdeveloped country.

But according to the “Willets Point Land Use Study” conducted Dr. Tom Angotti, a Professor at the Hunter College Center for Community Planning & Development, a study funded by Council Member Monserrate, business is bustling.

The study calculated that there were 225 firms operating in the area, employing somewhere between 1,400 – 1,800 employees. Close to 75% of those employed are Queens residents, many of whom are Spanish speaking, according to the study.

At the Thursday news conference, critics also emphasized that there was plenty of business activity in the area, which was being ignored by the Bloomberg administration. Speakers indicated that without the input of businesses already operating at Willets Point, jobs would be destroyed rather than created.

EDC has selected 8 companies who are bidding to develop Willets Point. They include: The Macerich Company and Avalon Bay Corporation, The Westfield Corporation, Vornado Realty Trust, TDC Development & Construction Company, Forest City Ratner Companies, The Related Companies, General Growth Properties, Inc., Rosenshein Associates, LCOR Incorporated, and Sage Hotel Corporation, Muss Development LLC

But before any of these developers can move forward with their proposed projects, which have not been made public, private property would have to be condemned by the City at Willets Point.

Council member Monserrate explained that the City’s proposed development process would involve condemning property by the power of eminent domain, resulting in what Council member Monserrate called “artificially” low real estate prices for the businesses and owners in Willets Point.

Adam Friedman, Executive Director of the New York Industrial Retention Network said, “There’s an awful lot of small business here, but together they employ 1,400 to 1,800 people. And they have survived under incredibly appalling conditions.”

Mr. Friedman acknowledged that even though the Bloomberg administration did not create those conditions, the administration did have an opportunity to rectify the situations that business owners and workers had long endured. He suggested the City go “through a correct planning process”¦figuring out how to keep these jobs here.”

Mr. Friedman also said that the City’s current proposals for Willets Point undermined the City’s ability to maintain its infrastructure.

He said: “The City has gone through a whole series of zoning changes. In those instances, and in this instance, what’s at risk here – concrete factories and asphalt plants, and the docks where they tie up the tugboats, and the barges – all of which are necessary to keep this City running, to build offices, to build new residential towers and buildings.”

Eve Baron, from the Municipal Art Society Planning Center, was also highly critical of the City’s planning process. She said, “The Willets Point RFP [Request for Proposals] enshrines the worst elements of planning in New York City and denies the best elements of this community. It’s developer driven, it’s market driven, it’s top down. It denies the economic synergy of existing businesses. It denies the diversity of interests and people of this community.”

But Janel Patterson, a spokeswoman for EDC, disputed the assertion that the community had not been included in the planning process or that the development process was not comprehensive.

In a statement sent to New York News Network, she wrote, “The RFEI [Requests for Expressions of Interest] and RFP for redevelopment of Willets Point were the result of extensive input and collaboration with numerous stakeholders including community members, community board representatives, elected officials and City and state agencies. The redevelopment goals and objectives were developed in partnership with the Willets Point Advisory Committee, headed by BP [Queens Borough President] Helen Marshall. Members of the Committee include Councilmen Liu and Monserrate, as well as Community Board 7, Assembly Members Jeff Aubrey and Nettie Mayersohn and State Senator Toby Stravinsky.”

Ms. Patterson continued: “The guidelines include targets for community and cultural uses, and requires that developers put forward a local hiring and participation plan that must include methods for facilitating MWBE involvement. The RFP responses will provide insight for the creation of a Master Development Plan, which will be subject to full public review before a developer is selected.”

Posted in Government & Politics | Comments Off on Critics Call for City to Reconsider Willets Point Development Process

As Council’s Powers Expanded, So Did Chris Quinn’s

By Maurice Pinzon
On January 4 Christine C. Quinn became the first woman and gay member of the New York City Council to become its speaker. Fifty of 51 members voted in her favor, with only Council member Charles Barron abstaining from the vote.

Council member Quinn overcame formidable challenges from Brooklyn Council member Bill de Blasio ”” who at one point had garnered 17 members’ support ”” and Council member Melinda Katz, a very successful fundraiser for the Democratic Party.

After the council meeting on Wednesday, Council member Barron, speaking to reporters, indicated that even though he held Speaker Quinn in high regard, he strongly objected to the process by which she had been selected. Barron charged that, “the county of Queens is running the city council.”

He added, “I know it’s coming from the county level because Christine wouldn’t do this.”

Council member Charles Barron assessed Ms. Quinn’s politics, by saying, “I think she’s quite frankly a little more progressive than [former Speaker] Gifford [Miller] ”” her politics and her philosophy ”” but it’s the pragmatism that I’m concerned about, and I don’t think there’s any difference there.”

However, Mr. Barron was not concerned about Speaker Quinn’s courage to stand up to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. Mr. Barron described Speaker Quinn as “very sharp, she’s very intelligent. She can handle herself with the mayor.”

Based on various interviews and this reporter’s contact with Ms. Quinn in the early 90’s, Speaker Quinn has navigated through the tube of power in New York City’s politics with a unique combination of skill, pragmatism, and groundbreaking vision. Ms. Quinn has had her eye on the City Council for a long time, and in some ways, her political power has grown alongside the council’s.

In the early 90’s, following the New York City Charter Revision Commission’s recommended ”” and voter-approved ”” changes to the City Charter to comply with a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the City violated the one person-one vote rule, the City Council gained power over land use, zoning, and the City budget.

Accompanying the power shift, the City Council expanded by 16 districts, infusing the newly empowered legislative body with open seats. Ms. Quinn saw the opportunity to support candidates who could fill the council’s vacancies.

In 1991 Ms. Quinn was working for the Association for Neighborhood Housing and Development when, over lunch, Ms. Quinn and her friend Jeffrey Plaut formulated the idea of starting an organization of well-educated, politically active young people willing to assist progressive candidates running for City Council.

Ms. Quinn, the consummate organizer, quickly listed what she and Mr. Plaut needed to do to get their project off the ground. They formed a group called PROPAC to raise money for candidates and bring together talented and politically ambitious individuals who had the time and skills to help run credible campaigns for people whom PROPAC viewed as progressives.

Next, Ms. Quinn and Mr. Plaut obtained the contact information for Coro and Urban Fellow participants, two programs for college graduates interested in public service.

They visited and spoke to anyone who would listen to them. Among their early contacts was Council member Ronnie M. Eldridge, who many recognized as perhaps the only independent and liberal Council member. Ms. Eldridge had just been elected to the council in 1990. Ms. Quinn and Mr. Plaut spoke to Ms. Eldridge’s chief of staff, Lisa Gugenheim, who did not agree to help in any specific way but did suggest others they could contact.

One evening, Margaret Nelson and this reporter, both also working at the time for Council member Eldridge, met with Ms. Quinn and Mr. Plaut at a Blarney Stone bar located at East 59th Street. In a recent interview with New York News Network, Ms. Nelson, who is now the Director of Real Estate Programs for the Brooklyn Development Corporation, recalled the first time she met Ms. Quinn.

Ms. Nelson said, “I first met and worked with Christine back when she was an affordable housing advocate and was starting PROPAC to organize support for progressive candidates for the expanding City Council in 1991.” She remembered Ms. Quinn as “sharp, dedicated,” adding that she “had a magnetic personality.”

Although Ms. Quinn and Mr. Plaut listened to the views of a diverse group of people, they always seemed eager to keep PROPAC on practical footing, tapping into the idealism of its members but focused on accomplishing concrete results ”” getting people elected to the council.

Eventually a recruiting event was organized in a loft space at 736 Broadway that belonged to someone helping the group. When about 125 young people showed up to the first meeting, PROPAC’s leaders realized that they had succeeded in reaching the very people they wanted in PROPAC. One person described it as the “wow” moment for the organization.

These new members included Andrew Kimball, recently appointed by Mayor Bloomberg as President of the Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation. He was previously Director of Operations for NYC2012, New York City’s Olympic bid committee.

Recently, when this reporter asked him what he recalled about Ms. Quinn, Mr. Kimball said, “I remember her as being an incredibly bright strategist and just an incredibly likable person.”

Others present at PROPAC meetings included Eric T. Schneiderman, now a New York State Senator; Bill Lipton, currently Co-Deputy Director of the Working Families Party; Jennifer O’Connor, who went on to become a White House assistant during the Clinton administration; and Julia Rothwax, who later worked for both the Clinton and Bradley presidential campaigns.

But soon after the successful first meeting of PROPAC, Ms. Quinn left to run Thomas K. Duane’s campaign for City Council. Mr. Duane was running in one of the newly created council districts. Years later, Ms. Quinn would replace Mr. Duane in the council after Mr. Duane ran for State Senate. In an interview with New York News Network, State Senator Duane recalled his first encounter with Ms. Quinn. Mr. Duane said, “I was just very impressed with her organizing skills and her zeal.”

Recalling the City Council race that Ms. Quinn managed, Senator Duane said, “We thought it was going to be your basic grassroots campaign.” But soon after, he said, “It turned out to be much higher profile. But she really met the challenge in every way. Not just the organizing, which I knew she’d be great on, but also the media ”” the sort of higher stakes that became part of the campaign.”

After taking office, Senator Duane made Ms. Quinn his Chief of Staff. Senator Duane said, “I think that I would have started off as a very good council member, but I think she made me a great council member.”

Senator Duane also credited Ms. Quinn with defending local school boards from a political attack by what he called a “Right-wing” attempt to take over the boards. Senator Duane said Ms. Quinn “was a big organizer of something called SCHOOL PAC, which was like PROPAC, and went out and recruited and helped to elect progressive school board candidates.”

Senator Duane also said Council member Quinn had been an important catalyst in the West Side community’s successful opposition to the stadium proposal, which the Bloomberg administration vigorously supported. Mr. Duane said during the conflict, Ms. Quinn was at her best, as “a fabulous organizer, fierce fighter and also a great negotiator.”

PROPAC would go on without Ms. Quinn to support the following candidates for City Council: Una Clarke and Pete Williams in Brooklyn, and Guillermo Linares and Mr. Duane in Manhattan. All the candidates won their races except for Mr. Williams.

PROPAC had a particularly significant impact on Linares’s disorganized campaign, helping him get on the ballot and eventually win the election.

Mr. Linares got elected and served in the council until he was forced out by term limits. He now serves as commissioner of the Bloomberg administration’s Office of Immigrant Affairs.

Mr. Plaut is now a partner with Global Strategy Group, a polling, marketing and political consulting firm.

Posted in Government & Politics | Comments Off on As Council’s Powers Expanded, So Did Chris Quinn’s