UN Cyprus Peace Plan Provokes Reaction from New York’s Cypriot Communities

By Nadia Damouni and Sasha Damouni
Invoking images of a united Cyprus after three decades of political unsettlement, in which two culturally similar but militarily divided communities, Turkish-Cypriots and Greek-Cypriots co-exist side-by-side may not be such a distant reality. But as generations of Cypriots living in their adoptive home of New York reflect optimistically on the current United Nations peace talks between the North and South of the island, others have yet to decide if reunification is a viable solution to the war-torn nation.

In the heart of Astoria, renowned for its Greek population, a group of youths congregate in the communal basement of an old club. Here, heated debates surround the current negotiations that began two weeks ago at the UN headquarters and have continued in the Cyprus capital, Nicosia, with an attempt to reunite the two sides ahead of the country’s accession into the European Union by May 1.

Nicole Papoulis, 17, an outspoken patriot among her Greek-Cypriot peers, instills a passionate view when describing her homeland. “I don’t believe Cyprus should reunite because there is already a shortage of jobs. Even though our economy is doing well, joining the European Union as one country will bring a large number of foreign people looking for work. This would simply cause a high unemployment rate among Greek-Cypriots.”

The young student, who was born and raised in Queens, admitted that she has only visited the south part of Cyprus, which is currently under the official control of the Greek-Cypriots and internationally recognized as its own republic as a result of Turkey’s invasion in 1974. Up to 37 percent of the northern territory occupied by 35,000 mainland Turkish troops and populated by 90,000 Turkish-Cypriots and 110,000 Turkish settlers, was declared a separate state in 1983, recognized only by Turkey.

In April 2003, both sides consented to opening their borders, providing the opportunity for displaced families to visit their former towns and villages. Phillip Christopher, president of the International Coordinating Committee for Justice for Cyprus, described how his birth right in Kyrenia, a prosperous town – now part of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) – was taken away from him following the invasion that has since prohibited the return of its former Greek-Cypriot inhabitants.

“It is unfair that our homes have been sold in the North of Cyprus to Turkish-Cypriots and even foreign tourists, such as Germans and British. If I want to buy my own house back, I should not be turned away because of my Greek-Cypriot origins. This is undemocratic,” Mr Christopher stressed.

Skevos Andreou, a college undergraduate who came to New York due to extensive family ties, also agreed to this sentiment, adding, “I was able to visit my father’s land and home when the borders opened but found a Turkish-Cypriot family living there. They bought our house, which was confiscated illegally by the government and even sold a part of the original land to other Turkish families.

“Obviously, it will be hard to reclaim this property, but we will eventually seek compensation,” he said.

This is a crucial factor that a majority of Greek-Cypriots in New York argue needs to be prioritized as part of the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan’s peace negotiations. The plan aims to build two constituent states as part of a single “bi-communal” and “bi-zonal” federation. With the participation of Greece and Turkey, two of the guarantor nations, Mr Annan specified that a “concentrated effort” would be made by all parties to provide “separate and simultaneous referenda” before the EU deadline.

However, Joey Murad, 69, a Turkish-Cypriot retiree living in Queens who has avidly monitored events in Cyprus since leaving his home in 1953, expressed his concern that a reunification may not be the best solution as both sides have already established themselves within their own national frameworks. “I believe if the Greek-Cypriots get the upper hand in the negotiations and join the EU along with us, they will eventually do away with the Turkish guarantor.

“I still feel the idea of enosis [Greek for unite] is still very strong between the Greek-Cypriots and Greece and this will be a source of tension, particularly if the two communities co-exist once again.”

As the former president of the Bronx-based Turkish-Cypriot Aid Society, Mr Murad indicated that he had no intention of moving back to Cyprus, not only because his parents abandoned their house and property in the southern town of Lefkara during the conflict but his livelihood and extended family relations, including four grandchildren, now consider New York their home.

“My children and grandchildren are American. Even though I have tried to teach them aspects of our culture and have even taken them to visit the North of Cyprus, they know this is not the town from where their grandfather was born and therefore don’t have a strong affinity to the land.”

Colleague and friend, Ali Sencer, 63, also noted that his sons had a reluctance to move from New York because their attachment to American culture was stronger than their desire to return. “My children feel that Cyprus is a foreign country. They treat it as any other part of the world, a place to travel at the summer time,” he said.

But Mr Murad and other members of his generation, both Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot, have indicated that the U. S. has provided them with the opportunity to express personal freedoms that they were unable to exercise before their initial departure from Cyprus.

Turkish-Cypriots are predominantly located in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore and Washington, with a population estimate between 2,000 and 3,000. By contrast, approximately 50,000 Greek-Cypriots live across the United States, half of which reside in New York.

Despite a mixed sentiment towards a reunification of the island, Maria Zoupaniotis, press counsellor of the permanent mission of Cyprus to the UN told NY News Network that the talks will aim to reach an agreement for a “final comprehensive settlement” in Cyprus, which would protect fundamental human rights, while the two federated states would enjoy sufficient autonomy.

She added that a solution would benefit the Turkish-Cypriot community more significantly than their Greek-Cypriot counterparts as 30 years of “isolation as a result of the Turkish occupation and difficulties on travel and trade had impeded economic and social development in the occupied part.”

Posted in Government & Politics | Comments Off on UN Cyprus Peace Plan Provokes Reaction from New York’s Cypriot Communities

Populism Gets a Hearing in New York City

By Maurice Pinzon
Yesterday, as Massachusetts Senator John Kerry was being endorsed by the AFL-CIO in Washington, D.C., Senator John Edwards ”” his only apparent rival for the Democratic nomination ”” was in New York, criticizing President Bush. Senator Edwards said the president’s policies have been increasing the nation’s economic divisions. He charged President Bush with looking out only for Wall Street’s well-being, to the detriment of other parts of New York.

Senator Edwards has been increasingly vocal in discussing the consequences of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to American workers, but until recently the jobs mostly had been characterized as manufacturing jobs. When the senator came to New York, however, he warned that manufacturing jobs are not the only ones at risk of going overseas ”” so are jobs involving intellectual labor.

During yesterday’s speech, Senator Edwards criticized President Bush’s policies, saying, “This president thinks that there is only one street in New York: Wall Street. And he thinks that when Wall Street is doing great, then everyone is doing fine.” He said that the decisions made on Wall Street “have a real impact right here in New York City, right here at one of the greatest universities in the world. Where once the only jobs that went overseas were in places like my hometown, today the jobs leaving are in places like your hometown. In the last few months, we have learned how journalists are taking jobs in journalism, financial analysis, and law to Bangalore.”

Senator Edwards then said, “Right now, most companies use the low road. That means they cut your wages and benefits as far as they can just to please the stock market. And when they can’t cut anymore, they pick up your job and take it to another country, where they can pay just pennies an hour. Our trade policies encourage it, and our tax policies reward companies for it.”

Senator Edwards also alluded to the great economic divide in the country when he described two New Yorks: “There’s one of privilege and comfort, and another filled with struggle. And they are close together and collide every day like in no other city. Right here, we are a short walk from some of the most dynamic neighborhoods in America and some of the poorest.”

Mayor Bloomberg, who has led an activist administration following policies philosophically and substantively different from mainstream Republicanism, took issue with Senator Edwards’s description of New York. The mayor said: “The real estate prices throughout all five boroughs are going up. Commercial vacancy rates are going down. There is an optimism about New York that you haven’t seen in years that is preposterous. New York is the world’s second home, and for anybody to say that, I guess he just hasn’t been here. We’d love to have him come here and spend some money and see just what goes on in the streets of New York, where crime is down, welfare rolls is down, jobs are coming in, people are building.”

Last week Massachusetts Democratic Congressman Barney Frank criticized the economy along similar lines when he spoke at the Milano Graduate School in Manhattan. But Congressman Frank went even further than Senator Edwards in describing the problems the economy faces. Congressman Frank said, “There is tremendous resistance to globalization.” And he continued, “Ten years ago we were told, ”˜Don’t worry about that. We will retrain these people so they can become technologically literate. We will retrain to get them into the technology field.’” Then Congressman Frank asked, “Guess what jobs are going overseas?”

“The jobs that people are being told they could be trained for are now going overseas,” he said. Congressman Frank said he did not think it was possible to pass any sort of trade bill as a result of the backlash against trade.

Congressman Frank attributed the U.S. economic malaise not only to trade issues but also to a “perception in this country that the fruits of increased productivity are simply not being shared, and therefore, it doesn’t work to tell people that they should accept some short-term sacrifice in their economic lives because the country as a whole will be better off.”

A Bush campaign spokesman returned a call placed by New York News Network but wanted to focus on Senator Edwards’s charge that the Republicans had politicized 9/11. The spokesman did not have time to comment on the trade issue.

Governor Pataki’s office did not return New York News Network’s phone calls.

Posted in Government & Politics | Comments Off on Populism Gets a Hearing in New York City

A Resistance Mounts to Ratner’s Brooklyn Project

By Maurice Pinzon
Brooklyn residents held a news conference today to announce their opposition to Bruce Ratner’s proposed development in Brooklyn, a project purportedly anchored by a basketball arena for the Nets.

In addition, tenants, homeowners, and business and property owners announced that they had formed a coalition called “Develop ”” don’t destroy Brooklyn,” which would be led by Norman Siegel, a long-time civil rights advocate who had successfully challenged Rudolph Giuliani’s policies when Mr. Giuliani was mayor.

Patti Hagan, Daniel Goldstein, Jezra Kaye and about 20 other community residents stood with Mr. Siegel and insisted that there were alternatives to Mr. Ratner’s proposed project. The group promised to present better, less disruptive ways to develop and improve their community. In addition, the groups said there were alternative sites for the Nets arena.

Council member Eric Gioia, who represents part of Queens, attended the news conference to support the group. He came to the attention of Brooklyn residents when Newsday Columnist Jimmy Breslin mentioned his name in relation to the Brooklyn development. Council member Gioia suggested that the parking lot of Shea Stadium would be a fine location for the Nets arena.

Indeed, the assembled group promised to mount a citywide campaign to highlight land use, legal, community and political issues arising due to the Mr. Ratner project.

Mr. Goldstein, a local resident, said Mr. Ratner “intends to wipe off the map the sweat, hopes, dreams and monetary investments made by hundreds of people in this community over decades.”

Then, taking a deep breath, he said, “I am outraged that many of this City[”˜s] and State’s most powerful elected officials have actively supported and guided Mr. Ratner’s land grab.”

Mr. Goldstein continued, “I am outraged by the proposed use of public funds from a financially strapped city for the benefit of a private entity. Is there anyone in this city who thinks it’s acceptable for a developer to use our tax money for a private development built to benefit the developer while destroying those same taxpayers’ lives?”

Mr. Siegel said the “the Atlantic Yards proposal raises complex issues inherent in the relationship of modern-day 21st-century urban government/private development.”

He also questioned whether it is “constitutional and legal to employ eminent domain procedures to condemn the private property of the residents and business owners of Prospect Heights for the benefit of a private developer, especially when that developer owns property and has rights to property adjacent to the proposed condemnation site.” Mr. Siegel said the project brought up legal questions about whether there was proper community input in the proceedings of eminent domain.

Rather than wait for the proper developers to act, Mr. Siegel said the group would begin to organize the community and mount a citywide campaign.

Mr. Siegel continued, “This project is by no means a slam dunk. I will be putting together a Develop ”” don’t destroy Brooklyn legal team that will analyze the constitutional, legal, policy, environmental and other issues involved in this project. No area will be unquestioned. No premise will go unchallenged.”

Mr. Siegel said he was optimistic that the group would get a proper hearing and support from City Council members, who do not want their neighborhoods disrupted by similar development projects.

In questioning the government’s use of the power of eminent domain, Mr. Siegel said, “We will argue vigorously this is not a blighted neighborhood.”

Neither Mayor Bloomberg’s Office nor Mr. Ratner’s spokespeople had comments on the matter.

Posted in Economy, Government & Politics | Comments Off on A Resistance Mounts to Ratner’s Brooklyn Project